Counter Cyclical Program in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,092
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $2,929,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Paul Martin Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $10,581 |
82 | Kevin Fowler | Adrian, MO 64720 | $10,565 |
83 | Daryl Bradley Freeze | Butler, MO 64730 | $10,516 |
84 | Fleischer Farms | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $10,204 |
85 | Jimmie Deon Hendrick | Butler, MO 64730 | $10,105 |
86 | Larry W Cook | Butler, MO 64730 | $9,900 |
87 | August Dean Fischer Trust | Butler, MO 64730 | $9,702 |
88 | Green Valley Ranch LLC | Rockville, MO 64780 | $9,633 |
89 | Carefree Farms Inc | Rockville, MO 64780 | $9,601 |
90 | Donald Lee Schapeler | Rockville, MO 64780 | $9,551 |
91 | Kevin L Fischer | Rockville, MO 64780 | $9,300 |
92 | Ivan D Fischer | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $9,300 |
93 | Timothy W Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $9,195 |
94 | Darren Wheatley | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $9,161 |
95 | Kenneth L Tenholder | Butler, MO 64730 | $8,748 |
96 | Jeffrey Earl Fischer | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $8,455 |
97 | Jerrell Alan Fischer | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $8,455 |
98 | Danny Gene Bracher | Rockville, MO 64780 | $8,412 |
99 | Cecil Merlin Reed | Lees Summit, MO 64086 | $8,369 |
100 | Michael L Cameron | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $8,344 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”