Deficiency Payment in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 617
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $1,057,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Willard Bettels | Butler, MO 64730 | $3,315 |
82 | Darrell Donavan Stevener | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $3,314 |
83 | Phillip Evan Stevener | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $3,314 |
84 | Thomas E Paxton | Butler, MO 64730 | $3,249 |
85 | Paul Clifford Schmidt | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $3,215 |
86 | R Wayne & Mildred L Blevins Trust | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $3,179 |
87 | Wayne Edwin Schapeler | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $3,176 |
88 | Charles E Franklin | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $3,143 |
89 | Terry A Vansandt | Adrian, MO 64720 | $3,138 |
90 | Larry Gene Seider | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $3,120 |
91 | David Lee Vanderman | Adrian, MO 64720 | $3,108 |
92 | Frank Woodall | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $3,095 |
93 | Wright B Piepmeier | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $3,085 |
94 | Albert Freeman Stanfill | Amoret, MO 64722 | $3,047 |
95 | Elvis Edwin Nelson | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $3,031 |
96 | Gary Schmidt | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $3,020 |
97 | Martin Levi Ghere | Butler, MO 64730 | $3,009 |
98 | F Tracy Rugg | Adrian, MO 64720 | $2,969 |
99 | Theodore Oleary | Kansas City, MO 64105 | $2,948 |
100 | Marvin D Seider | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $2,938 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”