Farm Subsidy information
Bates County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Bates County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 597
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $21,363,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mcelwain Land And Cattle LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $18,034 |
102 | Phillip Evan Stevener | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $17,545 |
103 | , | $17,545 | |
104 | , | $17,438 | |
105 | Tidman Land & Cattle Co LLC | Amoret, MO 64722 | $17,276 |
106 | Doug Cox Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $17,155 |
107 | , | $17,104 | |
108 | Dillion Franklin | Butler, MO 64730 | $17,016 |
109 | Wilson Farms Land & Cattle Co LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $16,910 |
110 | Michael John Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $16,858 |
111 | Meredith G Yarick - Yarick Revocable Trust | Hume, MO 64752 | $16,758 |
112 | Ryan Nitchals | Butler, MO 64730 | $16,295 |
113 | Raymond Mark Nitchals | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $16,216 |
114 | , | $16,134 | |
115 | Wilma J Gutshall | Adrian, MO 64720 | $15,885 |
116 | D Bracher Farms LLC | Rockville, MO 64780 | $15,836 |
117 | Donald P Brown | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $15,676 |
118 | Brandon J Nieder | Amoret, MO 64722 | $15,529 |
119 | Champlin Cattle Co LLC | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $15,251 |
120 | Geo E Callahan | Montrose, MO 64770 | $15,108 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”