Market Gains in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 168
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $2,841,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Larry Gene Seider | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $4,806 |
102 | Wilbur August Herman | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,542 |
103 | Dale Eugene Craft | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,365 |
104 | Ellis L Mcelwain | Adrian, MO 64720 | $4,338 |
105 | Barbara A Mcelwain | Adrian, MO 64720 | $4,338 |
106 | Shannons Circle S Ranch Inc | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $4,140 |
107 | Gary Russell | Louisburg, KS 66053 | $3,983 |
108 | Elvin Nieder | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $3,791 |
109 | Mervin Erwin Aurand | Adrian, MO 64720 | $3,771 |
110 | Kenneth L Tenholder | Butler, MO 64730 | $3,720 |
111 | David Joe Arnold | Drexel, MO 64742 | $3,616 |
112 | Marlon Dale Seider | Rockville, MO 64780 | $3,536 |
113 | Allen L Finklang | Adrian, MO 64720 | $3,345 |
114 | Lesley D Nieder | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $3,290 |
115 | Wesley R Nieder | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $3,043 |
116 | Darrel E Tenholder | Adrian, MO 64720 | $3,013 |
117 | Marvin & Velda Jagels Revocable T | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $2,930 |
118 | Alan E Nieder | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $2,773 |
119 | Five Star Cattle Company LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $2,600 |
120 | Lester James Breckenridge Jr Revocable Trust | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $2,577 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”