Loan Deficiency in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,054
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $18,997,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Bradford Scott Dirks | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $37,923 |
122 | Paul W Stangel | Rockville, MO 64780 | $37,618 |
123 | Hill Farms Inc | Drexel, MO 64742 | $36,776 |
124 | Mike L Durst | Butler, MO 64730 | $36,528 |
125 | Shawn M Vansandt | Adrian, MO 64720 | $36,505 |
126 | Jeffrey Earl Fischer | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $36,254 |
127 | Gm Feedlot Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $36,056 |
128 | Allen Fink | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $35,673 |
129 | Jerrell Alan Fischer | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $35,330 |
130 | Charles B Heiman | Rockville, MO 64780 | $34,831 |
131 | Craig Michael Nation | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $33,799 |
132 | Crawford Farms Inc | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $33,335 |
133 | Duane Harkrader | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $33,280 |
134 | Joseph M Robinson | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $32,757 |
135 | Elvin Nieder | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $32,687 |
136 | Meredith - Yarick Re G Yarick | Hume, MO 64752 | $32,671 |
137 | John Dale Herrmann | Adrian, MO 64720 | $32,452 |
138 | Brian W Johannigmeier | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $31,851 |
139 | Shawn V Johannigmeier | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $31,851 |
140 | David Joe Arnold | Drexel, MO 64742 | $31,784 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”