Total Commodity Programs in Bates County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 925
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $6,729,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Mcelwain Land And Cattle LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $17,290 |
122 | Donald P Brown | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $16,963 |
123 | James E Hess | Hume, MO 64752 | $16,851 |
124 | Dallas Jennings | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $16,671 |
125 | Goossen Farms LLC | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $16,622 |
126 | Gary Schmidt | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $16,591 |
127 | Scott L Baker | Urich, MO 64788 | $16,330 |
128 | Coffman Farms LLC | Rockville, MO 64780 | $16,003 |
129 | Michael John Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $15,919 |
130 | Paul Martin Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $15,676 |
131 | Brent N Bettels | Amoret, MO 64722 | $15,656 |
132 | Lincoln R Burch | Butler, MO 64730 | $15,450 |
133 | Marlon Dale Seider | Rockville, MO 64780 | $15,427 |
134 | Dirk Elliott Diehl | Butler, MO 64730 | $15,081 |
135 | Gregory A Wheatley | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $14,974 |
136 | Michael L Cameron | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $14,973 |
137 | Mcelwain Bros LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $14,963 |
138 | Phyllis-wheatley Revocable Trust Wheatley | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $14,925 |
139 | D Bracher Farms LLC | Rockville, MO 64780 | $14,720 |
140 | Kody Daniel Wainscott | Butler, MO 64730 | $14,577 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”