Farm Subsidy information
Bates County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Bates County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,065
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $30,375,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wilson Farms Land & Cattle Co LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $177,064 |
22 | Dalton Mcelwain Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $174,102 |
23 | Henry Lynn Wendleton | Butler, MO 64730 | $169,208 |
24 | M & W Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $168,418 |
25 | Brown Farms Eddie Inc | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $166,585 |
26 | Round Prairie Land & Cattle LLC | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $165,863 |
27 | Heiman Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $165,490 |
28 | Ferguson Brothers Farms LLC | Adrian, MO 64720 | $164,790 |
29 | Darrel E Tenholder | Adrian, MO 64720 | $163,261 |
30 | Robert A Christopher | Butler, MO 64730 | $153,155 |
31 | Daniel Martin Wainscott | Butler, MO 64730 | $150,550 |
32 | Ferguson Land & Cattle Company LLC | Adrian, MO 64720 | $147,571 |
33 | Hill Farms Inc | Drexel, MO 64742 | $146,620 |
34 | Dab Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $144,814 |
35 | Mark Cox Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $141,287 |
36 | Charles Trent Wilson | Butler, MO 64730 | $138,724 |
37 | Dean Fischer Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $137,384 |
38 | Kyle Fischer Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $137,311 |
39 | Brian O Seider | Butler, MO 64730 | $132,557 |
40 | Saathoff Farms | Adrian, MO 64720 | $126,812 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”