Farm Subsidy information
Bates County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Bates County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,003
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $18,229,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brown Farms Eddie Inc | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $57,069 |
22 | Doug Cox Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $56,878 |
23 | Dab Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $56,596 |
24 | Wilson Farms Land & Cattle Co LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $51,676 |
25 | Darrel E Tenholder | Adrian, MO 64720 | $51,620 |
26 | Daniel Martin Wainscott | Butler, MO 64730 | $49,810 |
27 | Craig Michael Nation | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $49,532 |
28 | Henry Lynn Wendleton | Butler, MO 64730 | $49,477 |
29 | Philip M Schapeler | Butler, MO 64730 | $49,093 |
30 | Kim Lampkin Diehl | Butler, MO 64730 | $49,012 |
31 | Daryl Bradley Freeze | Butler, MO 64730 | $48,682 |
32 | Mark Cox Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $48,212 |
33 | Elston Lee Dirks | Butler, MO 64730 | $47,458 |
34 | Heiman Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $46,887 |
35 | Dbs Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $46,621 |
36 | Ferguson Brothers Farms LLC | Adrian, MO 64720 | $46,028 |
37 | M & W Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $45,013 |
38 | Charles Trent Wilson | Butler, MO 64730 | $44,627 |
39 | James William Robinson | Butler, MO 64730 | $44,503 |
40 | Summit Feeders LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $44,364 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”