Farm Subsidy information
Bates County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,467
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $302,810,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Edwin Nelson | Amoret, MO 64722 | $747,252 |
42 | Thomas Edwin Ferguson | Adrian, MO 64720 | $741,280 |
43 | Daryl Bradley Freeze | Butler, MO 64730 | $740,889 |
44 | Floyd C Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $740,077 |
45 | Kenneth E Gregory | Urich, MO 64788 | $729,078 |
46 | Brown Farms Eddie Inc | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $724,304 |
47 | Kim Lampkin Diehl | Butler, MO 64730 | $717,493 |
48 | Carl Lee Ferguson | Adrian, MO 64720 | $714,969 |
49 | Daniel Martin Wainscott | Butler, MO 64730 | $710,261 |
50 | Devern Ray Koehn | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $700,172 |
51 | Francis Phillip Lesmeister | Butler, MO 64730 | $699,217 |
52 | Clifford G Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $678,272 |
53 | Yarick Farms Inc | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $677,519 |
54 | Bill H Gepford | Marco Island, FL 34145 | $666,650 |
55 | Michelle Lynn Brownsberger | Butler, MO 64730 | $658,750 |
56 | Brett Allan Harkrader | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $655,755 |
57 | Decker Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $641,240 |
58 | Kenneth L Tenholder | Butler, MO 64730 | $630,746 |
59 | Larry W Cook | Butler, MO 64730 | $615,895 |
60 | Dalton Mcelwain Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $611,131 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”