Deficiency Payment in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 617
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $1,057,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Danny R Eidson | Urich, MO 64788 | $5,493 |
42 | Gene Dines | Butler, MO 64730 | $5,213 |
43 | Charles Trent Wilson | Butler, MO 64730 | $5,120 |
44 | R D Marquardt | Rockville, MO 64780 | $5,009 |
45 | Jeffrey Elvis Nelson | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $4,989 |
46 | Cox Family Trust | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,927 |
47 | Green Valley Ranch Delete | Rockville, MO 64780 | $4,812 |
48 | Robert A Christopher | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,763 |
49 | Jack C Baker | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,736 |
50 | Wayne Craft | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,694 |
51 | Thomas Edwin Ferguson | Adrian, MO 64720 | $4,613 |
52 | Jerold B Fowler | Adrian, MO 64720 | $4,607 |
53 | Highley Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,400 |
54 | Chester Harry Dirks | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $4,371 |
55 | Clifford G Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $4,358 |
56 | Gary Jennings | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $4,298 |
57 | Robert D Burch Trust | Adrian, MO 64720 | $4,278 |
58 | Stanley G Stark | Archie, MO 64725 | $4,235 |
59 | Schapeler Farm | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $4,225 |
60 | James E Hess | Hume, MO 64752 | $4,091 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”