Total Commodity Programs in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,915
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $150,180,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas Edwin Ferguson | Adrian, MO 64720 | $660,433 |
42 | Devern Ray Koehn | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $654,309 |
43 | Francis Phillip Lesmeister | Butler, MO 64730 | $645,287 |
44 | Decker Farms LLC | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $641,240 |
45 | Brown Farms Eddie Inc | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $640,886 |
46 | Bill H Gepford | Marco Island, FL 34145 | $634,812 |
47 | Dab Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $633,801 |
48 | Brett Allan Harkrader | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $629,643 |
49 | Michelle Lynn Brownsberger | Butler, MO 64730 | $626,354 |
50 | Daniel Martin Wainscott | Butler, MO 64730 | $621,894 |
51 | Yarick Farms Inc | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $617,672 |
52 | Dalton Mcelwain Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $609,099 |
53 | Cheryl Jane Cook | Butler, MO 64730 | $606,359 |
54 | Daryl Bradley Freeze | Butler, MO 64730 | $586,697 |
55 | Cheryl Jane Cook | Butler, MO 64730 | $584,657 |
56 | Mark Cox Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $581,807 |
57 | Ferguson Brothers Farms LLC | Adrian, MO 64720 | $579,701 |
58 | Wilson Farms Land & Cattle Co LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $577,527 |
59 | Kim Lampkin Diehl | Butler, MO 64730 | $561,006 |
60 | Clayton William Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $558,269 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”