Direct Payment Program in Bollinger County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 903
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Bollinger County, Missouri totaled $8,890,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Joe Chaney | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $34,967 |
62 | Charles D Robins | Advance, MO 63730 | $34,931 |
63 | Daniel Dean Payne | Mcgee, MO 63763 | $34,569 |
64 | Steve Seiler | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $33,948 |
65 | Roy Allen | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $33,391 |
66 | Donald Whaley | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $32,454 |
67 | Paul Corbin | Advance, MO 63730 | $32,329 |
68 | Dennis Crader | Advance, MO 63730 | $31,981 |
69 | Marcia Vangennip | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $31,779 |
70 | J T Gregory | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $31,317 |
71 | Charles Eftink | Leopold, MO 63760 | $31,223 |
72 | David Anthony Landewee | Scott City, MO 63780 | $30,925 |
73 | Chris Kielhofner | Oran, MO 63771 | $26,797 |
74 | Zohn Kuhlmann | Marquand, MO 63655 | $26,751 |
75 | Gaynel Kielhofner | Oran, MO 63771 | $25,750 |
76 | Brian J Eeftink | Leopold, MO 63760 | $25,654 |
77 | Dannie W Shell | Advance, MO 63730 | $25,547 |
78 | Lucille Walker | Zalma, MO 63787 | $25,539 |
79 | Thomas J Null | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $25,417 |
80 | Jamey Neal Kight | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $25,301 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”