Market Loss Assistance Program in Bollinger County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 602
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Bollinger County, Missouri totaled $2,369,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Charles Collier | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $5,917 |
102 | Stephen A Bueter | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $5,912 |
103 | Paul P Tlapek | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $5,874 |
104 | Clyde Brune | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $5,719 |
105 | Marshall Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $5,641 |
106 | Loren Keith Wilson | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $5,505 |
107 | Sonny G Statler | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $5,490 |
108 | Kenneth M Vandeven | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $5,419 |
109 | W W Farms | Glenallen, MO 63751 | $5,345 |
110 | Ruth Waing | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $5,273 |
111 | Marion Vangennip | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $5,266 |
112 | William N Nitsch | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $5,133 |
113 | Ralph Macke | Leopold, MO 63760 | $5,087 |
114 | Charles Rhodes | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $4,928 |
115 | Charles Raymond Rhodes Jr | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $4,915 |
116 | Robert L Dever | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $4,745 |
117 | Gordon Lynn Hahn | Advance, MO 63730 | $4,739 |
118 | J Mark Bollinger | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $4,715 |
119 | Kenneth R Smith Revocable Trust | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $4,608 |
120 | Leonard Elfrink Family Revocable | Leopold, MO 63760 | $4,539 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”