Total Commodity Programs in Bollinger County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 645
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Bollinger County, Missouri totaled $1,469,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Tim Lukefahr | Leopold, MO 63760 | $3,025 |
102 | Alice Leanna Jones Revocable Trust | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $2,972 |
103 | Ryan J Yamnitz | Patton, MO 63662 | $2,927 |
104 | Keith D Wooten | Glenallen, MO 63751 | $2,919 |
105 | Gary L Cook | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $2,766 |
106 | Blake Christopher Cook | Patton, MO 63662 | $2,696 |
107 | Anita Sue Yamnitz | Patton, MO 63662 | $2,683 |
108 | Lance Hahn | Millersville, MO 63766 | $2,672 |
109 | Fulton Family Revocable Inter Vivos Trust | Patton, MO 63662 | $2,669 |
110 | Larry Hahn | Millersville, MO 63766 | $2,664 |
111 | Ellis 2002 Revocable Living Trust | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $2,645 |
112 | James V Bangert | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $2,634 |
113 | Lionshead Investments LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $2,600 |
114 | Jimmy L Null | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $2,588 |
115 | Larry Alfred Vangennip | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $2,570 |
116 | Elbert J Welker | Advance, MO 63730 | $2,504 |
117 | Janie Macke | Leopold, MO 63760 | $2,481 |
118 | Justin Bollinger | Sedgewickville, MO 63781 | $2,428 |
119 | Ambrose & Mary Jansen Revocable Trust | Leopold, MO 63760 | $2,421 |
120 | Keith Brotherton | Marble Hill, MO 63764 | $2,388 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”