Conservation Reserve Program in Buchanan County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 153
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Buchanan County, Missouri totaled $531,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jane Harris | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $6,819 |
22 | Lamont Lambert Kaelin Jr | Saint Joseph, MO 64504 | $6,740 |
23 | Silas O Taylor | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $6,708 |
24 | Steve F Culver Decl Of Trust | Easton, MO 64443 | $6,620 |
25 | Patricia J Culver Decl Of Trust | Easton, MO 64443 | $6,620 |
26 | David L Reddick | De Kalb, MO 64440 | $6,516 |
27 | Donald C Brown Jr Rev Tr Dtd 03/13/2003 | Kansas City, MO 64111 | $6,228 |
28 | Burton Family Trust Dtd 01-27-2021 | Kansas City, MO 64114 | $6,206 |
29 | Hunt LLC | Weston, MO 64098 | $6,190 |
30 | Richard N Deshon | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $6,095 |
31 | Scott William Archer | Faucett, MO 64448 | $5,916 |
32 | Mallow Farm LLC | Saint Joseph, MO 64504 | $5,611 |
33 | Ellen A Eskridge | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $5,378 |
34 | Gladise V. And Leroy L. Hausman Rev Trust | Savannah, MO 64485 | $5,215 |
35 | Parker Eirls Rice | Easton, MO 64443 | $5,181 |
36 | Lloyd W Nauman | Saint Joseph, MO 64507 | $4,914 |
37 | Roland C Peterson Revocable Trust | Easton, MO 64443 | $4,895 |
38 | Billy E Carter Jr | Trimble, MO 64492 | $4,707 |
39 | Donald E Stagner | Agency, MO 64401 | $4,606 |
40 | Edward F Fedrizzi | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $4,483 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”