Conservation Reserve Program in Buchanan County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 146
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Buchanan County, Missouri totaled $524,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sarah C Kepler | De Kalb, MO 64440 | $2,160 |
62 | David H Thomas | Rushville, MO 64484 | $2,149 |
63 | Shirley M Jackson - Shirley Jackson Trust Dated Ma | Saint Joseph, MO 64504 | $2,121 |
64 | Roy G Ferguson | Saint Joseph, MO 64507 | $2,071 |
65 | Billy Joe Schreiber | Easton, MO 64443 | $2,029 |
66 | John W Rapp | Easton, MO 64443 | $1,927 |
67 | Lorene M Brokaw | Kansas City, MO 64133 | $1,927 |
68 | Eddy P Woodward | Faucett, MO 64448 | $1,857 |
69 | Adam Clark Ford | Faucett, MO 64448 | $1,855 |
70 | Brian L Ussary | Agency, MO 64401 | $1,733 |
71 | Patsy M Moody Family Trust | Easton, MO 64443 | $1,676 |
72 | John E Wolfe | Faucett, MO 64448 | $1,600 |
73 | Brian Keith Free | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $1,502 |
74 | Jerry L Logston II | Easton, MO 64443 | $1,482 |
75 | Thomas C Judah Jr | De Kalb, MO 64440 | $1,476 |
76 | Robert Dean Rapp | Easton, MO 64443 | $1,415 |
77 | M Kay Ames-simmons | Sun City West, AZ 85375 | $1,390 |
78 | Joanna K Jung | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $1,389 |
79 | Thomas J Woodward | Rushville, MO 64484 | $1,381 |
80 | Terry E White | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $1,365 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”