Farm Subsidy information
Buchanan County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Buchanan County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 238
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Buchanan County, Missouri totaled $6,254,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Donald E Stagner | Agency, MO 64401 | $4,606 |
102 | Edward F Fedrizzi | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $4,483 |
103 | Jack Bridges | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $4,354 |
104 | Fred D Jackson | Easton, MO 64443 | $4,276 |
105 | Dennis L Jeffers | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $4,261 |
106 | , | $3,972 | |
107 | Gromer Hines Farms Inc | Saint Joseph, MO 64507 | $3,799 |
108 | Ronald H And Patricia S Auxier Jt Rev Tr | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $3,590 |
109 | Robert Till | Saint Joseph, MO 64507 | $3,590 |
110 | James R Wright | Saint Joseph, MO 64503 | $3,553 |
111 | Francis L Peniston Tr Dated January 7 1991 | Easton, MO 64443 | $3,522 |
112 | Roman Janorschke | Saint Joseph, MO 64504 | $3,409 |
113 | Cdc Farms LLC | Easton, MO 64443 | $3,404 |
114 | Shawn L Budine | Faucett, MO 64448 | $3,294 |
115 | Bob L Horn | Kansas City, MO 64155 | $3,251 |
116 | Roger L Turpin | Rushville, MO 64484 | $3,200 |
117 | Nelson-pettis Farms LLC | Flower Mound, TX 75028 | $3,130 |
118 | Joseph A Till | Saint Joseph, MO 64505 | $3,128 |
119 | Brian Keith Free | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $2,884 |
120 | Chad W Meers | Easton, MO 64443 | $2,882 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”