Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Butler County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 663
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $3,884,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Austin James Lance | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $29,677 |
22 | John Thomas Bonifield | Fisk, MO 63940 | $29,196 |
23 | Andee Thurman Bonifield | Fisk, MO 63940 | $29,196 |
24 | Stacy Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $29,154 |
25 | Sara Ann Musgraves LLC | Qulin, MO 63961 | $28,746 |
26 | Ethan Stuart Doyle | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $28,510 |
27 | Robert Lincoln Thurman III | Fisk, MO 63940 | $28,086 |
28 | Kristi Jean Thurman | Fisk, MO 63940 | $28,086 |
29 | Christopher Ward Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $26,938 |
30 | Hilary Lynnette Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $26,937 |
31 | Bruce A Goodrich | Fisk, MO 63940 | $26,753 |
32 | Kellie M Goodrich | Fisk, MO 63940 | $26,753 |
33 | Ronald Hover | Harviell, MO 63953 | $26,692 |
34 | Markel Allen Yarbro | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $26,231 |
35 | Benjamin Lee Ashcraft LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $24,847 |
36 | Lora Ashcraft LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $24,841 |
37 | Edna Ashcraft | Qulin, MO 63961 | $24,704 |
38 | Ricky Talbott | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $24,325 |
39 | Carol Talbott | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $24,321 |
40 | Kevin Dale Ashcraft | Qulin, MO 63961 | $24,281 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”