Farm Subsidy information
Butler County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Butler County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 705
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $9,374,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kevin Dale Ashcraft | Qulin, MO 63961 | $45,377 |
22 | Janes Family Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $44,849 |
23 | Vergena Murdean Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $44,130 |
24 | Webster Farms LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $43,174 |
25 | Pritchett Farm & Landgrading | Broseley, MO 63932 | $42,526 |
26 | Carl Breck Pierce | Qulin, MO 63961 | $41,023 |
27 | Ronnie Lee Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $40,363 |
28 | Kerri Deann Hicks | Fisk, MO 63940 | $39,952 |
29 | Gator Hole Farms Inc | Fisk, MO 63940 | $39,452 |
30 | Bruce A Goodrich | Fisk, MO 63940 | $37,698 |
31 | James David Hicks Jr | Fisk, MO 63940 | $35,605 |
32 | Hilary Lynnette Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $34,522 |
33 | Mendy N Ray | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $34,502 |
34 | Buttrey Farms | Fisk, MO 63940 | $34,482 |
35 | Donald Doser Jr | Qulin, MO 63961 | $32,794 |
36 | W Scott Morse | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $31,831 |
37 | Christopher Ward Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $31,238 |
38 | Jeremy Ray | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $31,065 |
39 | Nobles & Redmon Farming Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $28,401 |
40 | Clark Ag Company | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $27,068 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”