Deficiency Payment in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,007
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $15,887,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Leslie Thomas | Harviell, MO 63945 | $84,233 |
22 | Paul & Rodney Inc | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $84,185 |
23 | Sheridan D Thomas Rev Living Tr | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $83,429 |
24 | Ronald James Hover Jr | Harviell, MO 63945 | $82,701 |
25 | Todd Hughey Inman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $82,479 |
26 | H H Inman Farms Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $82,477 |
27 | Hughey H Inman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $82,477 |
28 | Joe Rommel | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $82,307 |
29 | Bruce Yarbro | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $82,283 |
30 | Markel Yarbro | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $81,871 |
31 | Chris Williams | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $81,195 |
32 | Russell Mcgowin | Fisk, MO 63940 | $80,108 |
33 | Harold Johnson Farms Inc | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $79,906 |
34 | Mickey I Thomas Rev Living Tr | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $78,948 |
35 | Danny Ray Sentell | Qulin, MO 63961 | $78,156 |
36 | Stateline Farms Inc | Lafe, AR 72436 | $77,666 |
37 | J & L Hover Farms Inc | Harviell, MO 63945 | $77,003 |
38 | Rebecca Thomas | Harviell, MO 63945 | $76,954 |
39 | C & M Of Butler County | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $75,981 |
40 | John Anthony Rodewald | Qulin, MO 63961 | $74,985 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”