Farm Subsidy information
Butler County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Butler County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 705
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $9,374,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Vince Lampe | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $25,945 |
42 | Kristi Jean Thurman | Fisk, MO 63940 | $25,762 |
43 | Rocky Dorris | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $25,376 |
44 | Robert Lincoln Thurman III | Fisk, MO 63940 | $24,159 |
45 | Justin Savat Partnership | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $23,584 |
46 | John Lampe | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $23,510 |
47 | Leah Lynn Madison | Qulin, MO 63961 | $23,193 |
48 | John French | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $22,300 |
49 | Kellie M Goodrich | Fisk, MO 63940 | $22,148 |
50 | Christine Lance | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $21,994 |
51 | Worley Farms Partnership | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $21,810 |
52 | Page Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $21,748 |
53 | Lana Jo Shearer | Qulin, MO 63961 | $21,192 |
54 | Dennis Robison Farms LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $20,997 |
55 | Vance Willard Madison | Qulin, MO 63961 | $20,960 |
56 | Rebecca Lee Turner | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $20,870 |
57 | Kevin Mikel Cunningham | Fisk, MO 63940 | $20,584 |
58 | Scheer Farms Ptr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $20,580 |
59 | Debra Leann Jones | Qulin, MO 63961 | $20,243 |
60 | Lori Annette Turner | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $20,084 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”