Counter Cyclical Program in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,269
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $12,230,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Anthony Benson | Qulin, MO 63961 | $49,010 |
42 | Leah Lynn Madison | Qulin, MO 63961 | $49,005 |
43 | Pike Slough Farms Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $48,581 |
44 | John Anthony Rodewald | Qulin, MO 63961 | $48,417 |
45 | Danny Ray Sentell | Qulin, MO 63961 | $48,409 |
46 | C & L Williams Farms Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $48,334 |
47 | Glodenia Mcgowin | Fisk, MO 63940 | $48,310 |
48 | Wanda Jones | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $47,970 |
49 | Ronald James Hover Jr | Harviell, MO 63945 | $47,713 |
50 | Dennis Robison | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $47,531 |
51 | Karon Faye Campbell | Qulin, MO 63961 | $47,360 |
52 | Paul & Rodney Inc | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $47,213 |
53 | Curtis Worley | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $46,855 |
54 | C & M Of Butler County | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $46,715 |
55 | Robert P Janes | Qulin, MO 63961 | $46,664 |
56 | Scheer Farms Ptr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $46,618 |
57 | Dockery Enterprise | Broseley, MO 63932 | $46,538 |
58 | Larry Mccallister | Broseley, MO 63932 | $46,481 |
59 | Rmc Agri Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $46,140 |
60 | John Michael Hill | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $46,037 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”