Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 189
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $260,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jay Githens | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,961 |
42 | Kenneth Cartez Whitehead | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,948 |
43 | Albert Coan | Harviell, MO 63945 | $1,937 |
44 | Chris Dunivan | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,820 |
45 | David Jones | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,811 |
46 | Robert F Sparkman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,714 |
47 | Michael Nelson | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,699 |
48 | H Curtis Dicken | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,586 |
49 | Patsy Miller | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,564 |
50 | Don Harris | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,563 |
51 | Norman Hicks | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,527 |
52 | Steve Mcneal | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,520 |
53 | Meredith Boyers | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,510 |
54 | Clifford E Dicken | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,452 |
55 | Rick Goins | Wappapello, MO 63966 | $1,422 |
56 | Allen Drew | Wappapello, MO 63966 | $1,419 |
57 | Terry Potter | Ellsinore, MO 63937 | $1,400 |
58 | Charles Shepard | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,363 |
59 | Jesse Gray | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,353 |
60 | Samuel Gullett | Williamsville, MO 63967 | $1,291 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”