Total Commodity Programs in Butler County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 586
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $1,743,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Janes Family Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $11,005 |
42 | Cynthia Leane Patterson | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $10,971 |
43 | Eric Wayne Patterson | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $10,971 |
44 | Kevin Mikel Cunningham | Fisk, MO 63940 | $10,852 |
45 | Ronald Hover | Harviell, MO 63953 | $10,790 |
46 | Renee Eaker | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $10,498 |
47 | Rodney Russell Eaker | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $10,498 |
48 | Nobles & Redmon Farming Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $10,428 |
49 | Ryan M Yarbro | Oxly, MO 63955 | $10,286 |
50 | Ethan Stuart Doyle | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $10,207 |
51 | Dockery Enterprise | Broseley, MO 63932 | $10,085 |
52 | Kevin Dale Ashcraft | Qulin, MO 63961 | $9,918 |
53 | Jacob A Worley | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $9,435 |
54 | Tonya Worley | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $9,433 |
55 | Christopher Ward Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $9,347 |
56 | Hilary Lynnette Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $9,347 |
57 | Grm Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $8,976 |
58 | Harold Johnson Farms Inc | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $8,908 |
59 | Jim Bieller | Broseley, MO 63932 | $8,687 |
60 | John Thomas Bonifield | Fisk, MO 63940 | $8,631 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”