Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Butler County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 663
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $3,884,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Cody Hanner | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $20,239 |
62 | Donna Woolard | Broseley, MO 63932 | $19,789 |
63 | Mike Woolard | Broseley, MO 63932 | $19,789 |
64 | Mst Farms LLC | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $19,491 |
65 | John Jason Rodewald | Broseley, MO 63932 | $19,471 |
66 | Stacey Nicole Rodewald | Broseley, MO 63932 | $19,469 |
67 | Dockery Enterprise | Broseley, MO 63932 | $19,441 |
68 | Andrew Rose | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $19,349 |
69 | Mark Anthony Benson | Qulin, MO 63961 | $19,264 |
70 | Letitia Ann Benson | Qulin, MO 63961 | $19,263 |
71 | Pritchett Farm & Landgrading | Broseley, MO 63932 | $18,877 |
72 | Robert Lincoln Thurman Jr | Fisk, MO 63940 | $18,572 |
73 | Leavera Dean Thurman | Fisk, MO 63940 | $18,571 |
74 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $17,960 |
75 | Breckenridge Farms Inc | Qulin, MO 63961 | $17,293 |
76 | Bob Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $17,138 |
77 | Annis Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $17,138 |
78 | Niki Johnson French | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $17,114 |
79 | John French | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $17,113 |
80 | Jacob A Worley | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $16,677 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”