Farm Subsidy information
Butler County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,262
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $466,447,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Savat Farms Partnership | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,262,808 |
62 | Glodenia Mcgowin | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,260,864 |
63 | Barbara Kay Cunningham | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,259,839 |
64 | Buel Winford Campbell Jr | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,251,299 |
65 | Ricky Talbott | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,239,071 |
66 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,236,035 |
67 | Robert Lincoln Thurman Jr | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,234,835 |
68 | Ronald Hover | Harviell, MO 63953 | $1,232,518 |
69 | Roger Baxter | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,231,578 |
70 | Tony Sturgeon | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,225,474 |
71 | Dewey Inman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,212,097 |
72 | H H Inman Farms Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,203,409 |
73 | Jamie L Ray | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,202,365 |
74 | Leavera Dean Thurman | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,193,864 |
75 | Sherry Sturgeon | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,189,255 |
76 | Harold Lynn Thurman | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,168,038 |
77 | Markel Yarbro | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,167,400 |
78 | Leslie Thomas | Harviell, MO 63945 | $1,167,320 |
79 | Karon Faye Campbell | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,166,984 |
80 | Richard Yarbro | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,163,379 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”