Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,214
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $83,346,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | R & S Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $277,856 |
82 | Denise Lewis | Fisk, MO 63940 | $276,067 |
83 | Melvin Lee Lewis Jr | Fisk, MO 63940 | $276,058 |
84 | Edna Ashcraft | Qulin, MO 63961 | $273,323 |
85 | 4-s Family Farms Partnership | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $272,650 |
86 | Tambra Mcbroom | Qulin, MO 63961 | $270,691 |
87 | Gary Mcbroom | Qulin, MO 63961 | $266,520 |
88 | Dennis Alford | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $260,252 |
89 | Barbara Kay Gambill | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $252,140 |
90 | Bob Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $250,386 |
91 | Annis Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $250,386 |
92 | John Anthony Rodewald | Qulin, MO 63961 | $248,910 |
93 | James Kenneth Gambill | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $246,914 |
94 | Dale Morgan | Fisk, MO 63940 | $245,631 |
95 | Eric W Patterson | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $245,359 |
96 | Cynthia Yarbro Patterson | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $245,355 |
97 | Dockery Enterprise | Broseley, MO 63932 | $244,430 |
98 | James Kenneth Gambill II | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $237,591 |
99 | Julie Gambill | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $237,591 |
100 | Bill Gillean | Fisk, MO 63940 | $236,964 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”