Farm Subsidy information
Butler County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Butler County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 705
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $9,374,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Stacey Nicole Rodewald | Broseley, MO 63932 | $13,035 |
102 | Casey Ann Parson | Broseley, MO 63932 | $12,988 |
103 | Isaiah Jones | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $12,930 |
104 | Lora Ashcraft LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $12,874 |
105 | Daniel Trent Tompkins | Qulin, MO 63961 | $12,831 |
106 | Fred D Baxter Jr | Qulin, MO 63961 | $12,766 |
107 | Niki Johnson French | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $12,509 |
108 | First National Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72451 | $12,490 |
109 | Travis Lee Parson | Broseley, MO 63932 | $12,308 |
110 | John Jason Rodewald | Broseley, MO 63932 | $12,143 |
111 | Mst Farms LLC | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $11,928 |
112 | Ethan Stuart Doyle | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $11,875 |
113 | Dale Morgan | Fisk, MO 63940 | $11,797 |
114 | R & S Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $11,790 |
115 | Ronald Hover | Harviell, MO 63953 | $11,387 |
116 | Michael Keith Johnson | Williamsville, MO 63967 | $11,189 |
117 | Shana Mcbroom | Qulin, MO 63961 | $11,039 |
118 | Whittom Properties, LLC | Foristell, MO 63348 | $11,015 |
119 | Gilleans Family Farm LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $10,918 |
120 | Debra Gillean | Fisk, MO 63940 | $10,913 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”