Counter Cyclical Program in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,269
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $12,230,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gordon Lee Wright | Qulin, MO 63961 | $37,350 |
102 | R & S Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $37,272 |
103 | Donna Ashcraft Fincher | Qulin, MO 63961 | $37,197 |
104 | Zelma Faye Smody | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $37,189 |
105 | Patricia Jane Smody | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $37,189 |
106 | Donny Charles Wrather | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $37,063 |
107 | Clark's River Farm Inc | Fisk, MO 63940 | $37,060 |
108 | Joe Steven Morse | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $37,037 |
109 | Barbara Sue Hover | Harviell, MO 63945 | $37,006 |
110 | Wright Farms Of Butler County Inc | Qulin, MO 63961 | $36,903 |
111 | Karen Lance | Ellsinore, MO 63937 | $36,790 |
112 | Bill Gillean | Fisk, MO 63940 | $36,727 |
113 | John Inman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $36,444 |
114 | Ryan Andrew Turner | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $36,169 |
115 | Robert Lincoln Thurman Jr | Fisk, MO 63940 | $36,047 |
116 | P & S Inc | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $35,909 |
117 | Mitchell Steven Clark | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $35,677 |
118 | James Andrew Clark | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $35,677 |
119 | Mark Mccallister | Qulin, MO 63961 | $35,641 |
120 | Rogenia May Thurman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $35,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”