Total Commodity Programs in Butler County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 874
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $10,591,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Alan-michael Shearer | Qulin, MO 63961 | $21,825 |
102 | Glendon Stacy&debra Stacy Rev Tr Jr | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $21,790 |
103 | Ruchelle Eudaley | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $21,765 |
104 | Gregory S Eudaley | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $21,765 |
105 | Gator Hole Farms Inc | Fisk, MO 63940 | $21,761 |
106 | Tammica Spencer | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $21,556 |
107 | Scott Spencer | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $21,554 |
108 | Markel & Shirley Yarbro Rev Lv Tr | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $21,294 |
109 | Max Tompkins | Qulin, MO 63961 | $21,271 |
110 | Carrie A Jones | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $20,974 |
111 | Christerpher Glen Jones | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $20,973 |
112 | T D Kelley | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $20,972 |
113 | Barry Barnett | Broseley, MO 63932 | $20,646 |
114 | Charles William Patterson | Fisk, MO 63940 | $20,486 |
115 | Cody Hanner | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $20,239 |
116 | David Ashcraft Trust | Qulin, MO 63961 | $20,216 |
117 | Jerry Martin | Fisk, MO 63940 | $20,057 |
118 | Toni Martin | Fisk, MO 63940 | $20,057 |
119 | Klt Farms Inc | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $19,804 |
120 | Gsa Farms | Dudley, MO 63936 | $19,523 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”