Counter Cyclical Program in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,269
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $12,230,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Harold Lynn Thurman | Fisk, MO 63940 | $35,607 |
122 | Allen Lee Clark | Fisk, MO 63940 | $35,327 |
123 | Charles William Patterson | Fisk, MO 63940 | $34,999 |
124 | Melvin Lee Lewis Jr | Fisk, MO 63940 | $34,862 |
125 | Bob Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $34,276 |
126 | Coon Island Farms Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $33,919 |
127 | Dewey Inman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $33,756 |
128 | Leavera Dean Thurman | Fisk, MO 63940 | $33,730 |
129 | Steven Rommel | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $33,679 |
130 | Annis Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $33,405 |
131 | Richard Yarbro | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $33,306 |
132 | John Thomas Bonifield | Fisk, MO 63940 | $33,176 |
133 | Gary Pride | Qulin, MO 63961 | $33,066 |
134 | David Ashcraft Trust | Qulin, MO 63961 | $32,950 |
135 | Robison Grain Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $32,536 |
136 | Melanie L Rommel | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $32,353 |
137 | Debbie Rodewald | Qulin, MO 63961 | $32,281 |
138 | Inman Agri Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $32,196 |
139 | Clarence Edward Crites | Broseley, MO 63932 | $31,801 |
140 | H & I Inman Farms Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $31,588 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”