Total Commodity Programs in Butler County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 874
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $10,591,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John Jason Rodewald | Broseley, MO 63932 | $19,471 |
122 | Stacey Nicole Rodewald | Broseley, MO 63932 | $19,469 |
123 | Dockery Enterprise | Broseley, MO 63932 | $19,441 |
124 | Mark Anthony Benson | Qulin, MO 63961 | $19,264 |
125 | Lance M Madison | Qulin, MO 63961 | $19,108 |
126 | John Inman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $18,635 |
127 | Robert Lincoln Thurman Jr | Fisk, MO 63940 | $18,572 |
128 | Leavera Dean Thurman | Fisk, MO 63940 | $18,571 |
129 | Rickman Farms Limited Partnership | Conway, AR 72033 | $18,370 |
130 | Richard Yarbro | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $18,361 |
131 | Holden Lea Madison | Qulin, MO 63961 | $17,815 |
132 | Breckenridge Farms Inc | Qulin, MO 63961 | $17,293 |
133 | Jacob A Worley | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $16,677 |
134 | Tonya Worley | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $16,675 |
135 | Travis Lee Parson | Broseley, MO 63932 | $16,657 |
136 | Casey Ann Parson | Broseley, MO 63932 | $16,656 |
137 | Virgil Carl Wagner | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $16,610 |
138 | Stephen R Breckenridge | Qulin, MO 63961 | $16,556 |
139 | Martin Family Limited Partnership | Fisk, MO 63940 | $16,504 |
140 | Jerry Dollins | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $16,098 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”