Farm Subsidy information
Butler County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Butler County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 705
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $9,374,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Charles Parker Johnson | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $8,679 |
142 | Shull Barker Property Management, LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $8,674 |
143 | Politea Stockton | Qulin, MO 63961 | $8,578 |
144 | Chad Bell | Wappapello, MO 63966 | $8,524 |
145 | Inman Bros Farms Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $7,999 |
146 | Willard Abbott | Williamsville, MO 63967 | $7,855 |
147 | Ricky Talbott | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $7,834 |
148 | Carol Talbott | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $7,834 |
149 | Daniel Dorris | Harviell, MO 63945 | $7,746 |
150 | Cj Land And Cattle LLC | Ellsinore, MO 63937 | $7,733 |
151 | Gene Pratt | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $7,585 |
152 | Ronald James Hover Jr | Harviell, MO 63945 | $7,583 |
153 | Cynthia Eileen Hover | Harviell, MO 63945 | $7,582 |
154 | Kelly Boyers | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $7,285 |
155 | Letitia Ann Benson | Qulin, MO 63961 | $7,033 |
156 | R J Boyers | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $7,024 |
157 | James Pollock Jr | Charleston, MO 63834 | $6,887 |
158 | Inman Agri Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $6,869 |
159 | Philip Shannon Bullock | Qulin, MO 63961 | $6,842 |
160 | Gary D Murphy II Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $6,710 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”