Total Commodity Programs in Butler County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 874
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $10,591,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Strickland Farms Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | $16,000 |
142 | James David Hicks Jr | Fisk, MO 63940 | $15,987 |
143 | Kerri Deann Hicks | Fisk, MO 63940 | $15,986 |
144 | First Missouri Bank Of Semo ** | Kennett, MO 63857 | $15,828 |
145 | John Pete Conover | Broseley, MO 63932 | $15,715 |
146 | Roger Baxter | Qulin, MO 63961 | $15,519 |
147 | Debbie Baxter | Qulin, MO 63961 | $15,518 |
148 | Mark Lance | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $15,511 |
149 | Christine Lance | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $15,509 |
150 | Steve Brown | Broseley, MO 63932 | $15,389 |
151 | Donna J Brown | Broseley, MO 63932 | $15,389 |
152 | Ronald James Hover Jr | Harviell, MO 63945 | $14,737 |
153 | Cynthia Eileen Hover | Harviell, MO 63945 | $14,734 |
154 | Webster Farms LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $14,626 |
155 | Keith Glen Shearer | Qulin, MO 63961 | $14,140 |
156 | Lana Jo Shearer | Qulin, MO 63961 | $14,138 |
157 | Aileen Marie Dockery | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $13,998 |
158 | Roy Lee Ashcraft Trust | Qulin, MO 63961 | $13,961 |
159 | James Kenneth Gambill II | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $13,912 |
160 | Julie Gambill | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $13,912 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”