Emergency Conservation Program in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 85
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $568,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gary Morse | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,900 |
42 | Five Eaker Farms | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $2,830 |
43 | Randall Wayne Knodell | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,696 |
44 | Douglas Murphy | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | $2,651 |
45 | John Ward | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,631 |
46 | Ricky Talbott | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $2,568 |
47 | Thomas Farms | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $2,514 |
48 | Jeremy Ray | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,458 |
49 | Dana K Cayo | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,441 |
50 | Kevin Fields | Glencoe, MO 63038 | $2,409 |
51 | Roger Shawn Tompkins | Qulin, MO 63961 | $2,223 |
52 | Roger Glen Tompkins | Qulin, MO 63961 | $2,221 |
53 | Hershel D Burress Trust | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,194 |
54 | Rodney Russell Eaker | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,137 |
55 | Cody Hanner | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,127 |
56 | R J Boyers | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,010 |
57 | Curtis Ray Reinbott II | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,903 |
58 | Ronald James Hover Jr | Harviell, MO 63945 | $1,865 |
59 | Arvel Billington | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,805 |
60 | Virgil Carl Wagner | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,621 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”