Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Butler County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 77
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $227,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Denise Lewis | Fisk, MO 63940 | $10,505 |
2 | Andee Thurman Bonifield | Fisk, MO 63940 | $9,252 |
3 | Nancy Sue Inman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $8,548 |
4 | Kristi Jean Thurman | Fisk, MO 63940 | $8,525 |
5 | Lora Ashcraft LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $7,776 |
6 | Hilary Lynnette Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $7,442 |
7 | Vergena Murdean Berry | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $7,134 |
8 | Pritchett Farm & Landgrading | Broseley, MO 63932 | $6,875 |
9 | Donna Woolard | Broseley, MO 63932 | $6,781 |
10 | Cynthia Leane Patterson | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $6,568 |
11 | Gator Hole Farms Inc | Fisk, MO 63940 | $6,378 |
12 | Douglas Edward Morse | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $6,280 |
13 | Stacey Nicole Rodewald | Broseley, MO 63932 | $6,149 |
14 | Patricia Jane Smody | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $5,775 |
15 | Leavera Dean Thurman | Fisk, MO 63940 | $5,535 |
16 | , | $5,518 | |
17 | Casey Ann Parson | Broseley, MO 63932 | $4,730 |
18 | Leah Lynn Madison | Qulin, MO 63961 | $4,551 |
19 | Lana Jo Shearer | Qulin, MO 63961 | $4,515 |
20 | Annis Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $4,499 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>