Farm Subsidy information
Butler County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,144
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $445,356,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Double E Farms | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,457,350 |
42 | Melvin Lee Lewis Jr | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,421,746 |
43 | John Pete Conover | Broseley, MO 63932 | $1,420,739 |
44 | Letitia Ann Benson | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,418,236 |
45 | Bob Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,386,706 |
46 | R & S Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,384,659 |
47 | Annis Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,373,280 |
48 | Christerpher Glen Jones | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,370,234 |
49 | Scott Edward Cunningham | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,354,290 |
50 | Ronald James Hover Jr | Harviell, MO 63945 | $1,339,867 |
51 | John Anthony Rodewald | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,327,115 |
52 | Russell Mcgowin | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,325,315 |
53 | Dockery Enterprise | Broseley, MO 63932 | $1,312,333 |
54 | Bill Gillean | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,307,342 |
55 | Ozell Johnson Revocable Living Tr | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,303,648 |
56 | Gary Mcbroom | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,288,542 |
57 | Martin Farms Inc | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,264,928 |
58 | Janes Family Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,262,248 |
59 | Glodenia Mcgowin | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,260,864 |
60 | Savat Farms Partnership | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,257,905 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”