Farm Subsidy information
Butler County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,262
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $466,447,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Anthony Benson | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,512,361 |
42 | Double E Farms | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,495,698 |
43 | Letitia Ann Benson | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,452,061 |
44 | John Pete Conover | Broseley, MO 63932 | $1,425,823 |
45 | Bob Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,412,309 |
46 | Annis Walls | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,405,264 |
47 | Dockery Enterprise | Broseley, MO 63932 | $1,397,142 |
48 | R & S Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,384,659 |
49 | Ronald James Hover Jr | Harviell, MO 63945 | $1,376,582 |
50 | Christerpher Glen Jones | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,370,234 |
51 | Scott Edward Cunningham | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,367,924 |
52 | Carl Breck Pierce | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,344,497 |
53 | Bill Gillean | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,334,883 |
54 | Janes Family Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,330,715 |
55 | John Anthony Rodewald | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,329,228 |
56 | Russell Mcgowin | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,325,315 |
57 | Ozell Johnson Revocable Living Tr | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $1,303,648 |
58 | Gary Mcbroom | Qulin, MO 63961 | $1,300,417 |
59 | Markel Allen Yarbro | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,297,208 |
60 | Martin Farms Inc | Fisk, MO 63940 | $1,294,561 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”