Conservation Reserve Program in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 92
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $1,763,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Black River Ranch Management LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $155,392 |
2 | Wendell Shands | Harviell, MO 63945 | $137,398 |
3 | Curtis Ray Reinbott II | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $115,963 |
4 | Louise Shull Medler Rev Trust | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $84,971 |
5 | Shull Barker Property Management, LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $60,718 |
6 | Neelyville U Methodist Church | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $59,279 |
7 | Douglas Murphy | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | $59,112 |
8 | Sam Buttrey | Fisk, MO 63940 | $53,373 |
9 | William Whittom Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $50,369 |
10 | Whittom Properties, LLC | Foristell, MO 63348 | $46,605 |
11 | Gary D Rush | Harviell, MO 63945 | $44,181 |
12 | Persons Land & Equipment LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | $38,320 |
13 | Edward L Russell | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $35,573 |
14 | Rita C Clanahan | Williamsville, MO 63967 | $34,675 |
15 | Donald Hover | Harviell, MO 63945 | $31,582 |
16 | Lennie Maddox | Fisk, MO 63940 | $30,355 |
17 | Ronald James Hover Jr | Harviell, MO 63945 | $29,001 |
18 | Cynthia Eileen Hover | Harviell, MO 63945 | $28,988 |
19 | Mark Parker | Fenton, MO 63026 | $27,559 |
20 | James Pollock Jr | Charleston, MO 63834 | $27,549 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>