Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in Butler County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 47
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $340,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stacy Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $23,750 |
2 | Clark Ag Company | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $23,750 |
3 | Christine Lance | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $11,875 |
4 | Hughey H Inman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $11,875 |
5 | Tambra Mcbroom | Qulin, MO 63961 | $11,875 |
6 | Mark Lance | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $11,875 |
7 | Donald Doser Jr | Qulin, MO 63961 | $11,875 |
8 | J W Mcgee | Qulin, MO 63961 | $11,875 |
9 | Ronald D Lance | Qulin, MO 63961 | $11,875 |
10 | Gary Mcbroom | Qulin, MO 63961 | $11,875 |
11 | Nancy Sue Inman | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $11,875 |
12 | Kade Mcbroom | Qulin, MO 63961 | $11,875 |
13 | Klt Farms Inc | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $11,875 |
14 | Mlt Farms Inc | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $11,875 |
15 | Thomas Brothers Farms Inc | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $11,875 |
16 | Jrt Farms LLC | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $11,041 |
17 | Carl Breck Pierce | Qulin, MO 63961 | $10,934 |
18 | Lori Annette Turner | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $10,662 |
19 | Larry - Larry Duncan Revoc Inter-vivos Duncan | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $10,035 |
20 | Thomas Howard Turner | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $9,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>