Conservation Reserve Program in Callaway County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 859
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Callaway County, Missouri totaled $28,876,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Marilyn P Jones | Auxvasse, MO 65231 | $91,815 |
82 | Richard Dark | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $90,952 |
83 | W W Hardin | Fulton, MO 65251 | $90,855 |
84 | John B Hopkins Revocable Tr | Auxvasse, MO 65231 | $87,950 |
85 | Ronald J Sommer | Auxvasse, MO 65231 | $86,135 |
86 | Harold Floyd Rainey | Auxvasse, MO 65231 | $85,047 |
87 | Gordon K Hauck | Fulton, MO 65251 | $84,858 |
88 | Mary Sue Dietz | Fulton, MO 65251 | $83,142 |
89 | Ruel A Chastonay | Hartsburg, MO 65039 | $83,052 |
90 | Mccormick Restated Family Trust D | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $82,214 |
91 | Ronald Reynolds | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $80,813 |
92 | Otto Wayne Koelling Trustee | Tebbetts, MO 65080 | $80,750 |
93 | Garrett Brothers Farm | Rhineland, MO 65069 | $80,668 |
94 | L G And Dana Berry | Holts Summit, MO 65043 | $79,048 |
95 | Jerald S Aubuchon | Old Monroe, MO 63369 | $77,253 |
96 | Marilyn Schneider | Creve Coeur, MO 63141 | $77,207 |
97 | Jerrold E Eads | Columbia, MO 65202 | $75,965 |
98 | Bradley Baldwin | Imperial, MO 63052 | $75,479 |
99 | Ted T Wilt | Fulton, MO 65251 | $75,331 |
100 | Mary Ellen Schaefer Rev Liv Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $75,050 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”