Farm Subsidy information
Camden County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Camden County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 199
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Camden County, Missouri totaled $569,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ernest Lee Calvert Jr | Camdenton, MO 65020 | $1,720 |
62 | Darrell Walden | Camdenton, MO 65020 | $1,679 |
63 | Adam Carnes | Richland, MO 65556 | $1,645 |
64 | Roderick S Russell - Ozark Hills Farm LLC | Lake Ozark, MO 65049 | $1,635 |
65 | Richard H Bradley Jr | Linn Creek, MO 65052 | $1,609 |
66 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,604 |
67 | Don G Kinney | Macks Creek, MO 65786 | $1,596 |
68 | Jacob Michael Wackerman | Montreal, MO 65591 | $1,591 |
69 | Mark Phillips | Climax Springs, MO 65324 | $1,586 |
70 | Cheryl L Patton | Stoutland, MO 65567 | $1,571 |
71 | Clarence A Christensen | Montreal, MO 65591 | $1,534 |
72 | Ben Rooffener | Macks Creek, MO 65786 | $1,514 |
73 | Aaron B Lercher | Richland, MO 65556 | $1,508 |
74 | Lee Roy Myers | Richland, MO 65556 | $1,505 |
75 | Robert Lee Daniel | Stoutland, MO 65567 | $1,499 |
76 | Billie L Frederick | Montreal, MO 65591 | $1,470 |
77 | Andy Hellums | Macks Creek, MO 65786 | $1,458 |
78 | Danny Willis | Macks Creek, MO 65786 | $1,453 |
79 | Allen Shaw | Stoutland, MO 65567 | $1,440 |
80 | Betty Rogers | Camdenton, MO 65020 | $1,419 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”