Total Conservation Programs in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, 2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 209

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri totaled $529,000 in in 2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
2023
21Ronald McdowellJackson, MO 63755$6,009
22Mark Anthony Elfrink And Shari Layne Elfrink RevocJackson, MO 63755$5,892
23Voshage Qualified Spousal Trust Agreement Dtd JuneJackson, MO 63755$5,875
24Robert L Ford & Marty D Ford Joint Revocable TrustWhitewater, MO 63785$5,859
25Martha E HildebrandtPleasant Valley, MO 64068$5,756
26Jerry R Lorberg And Barbara J Lorberg Revocable TrCape Girardeau, MO 63701$5,546
27Larry L Bock Rev TrustCape Girardeau, MO 63701$5,452
28Semina F SeyerOak Ridge, MO 63769$4,838
29Falast Living TrustAltenburg, MO 63732$4,759
30Stanley H Riehn Rev TrustOak Ridge, MO 63769$4,741
31, $4,645
32David & Phyllis Schwab Living TrustJackson, MO 63755$4,570
33Hindman Farm LpCape Girardeau, MO 63701$4,527
34Billy Russell DawsonCape Girardeau, MO 63701$4,355
35Matthew RuchDaisy, MO 63743$4,257
36Shawnee Farms %jeff PreusserJackson, MO 63755$4,026
37Caney Valley Farm LLCJackson, MO 63755$4,000
38J N S Farms LLCCape Girardeau, MO 63701$3,875
39Matthew BerryJackson, MO 63755$3,797
40John D Dudley Rev TrustWhitewater, MO 63785$3,696

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag