Total Disaster Programs in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 192
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri totaled $1,148,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tim Neal | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $6,665 |
42 | Leon Aufdenberg Rev Trust | Burfordville, MO 63739 | $6,565 |
43 | Phillip Andrew Sander | Burfordville, MO 63739 | $6,456 |
44 | Wayne Bodenstein Jr | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $6,436 |
45 | Lloyd Francis Farms Inc | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $6,202 |
46 | Steven Michael Pleimann | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $6,180 |
47 | M & S Aufdenberg Farms LLC | Jackson, MO 63755 | $5,911 |
48 | Glen W. Birk Living Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $5,841 |
49 | Keith Eftink Farms LLC | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $5,565 |
50 | Lone Tree Ranch | Jackson, MO 63755 | $5,403 |
51 | Lang Brothers Farms | Jackson, MO 63755 | $5,294 |
52 | Ronald Versemann - Ronald H Versemann Rev Trust H | Jackson, MO 63755 | $5,197 |
53 | Harold W Phillips Rev Trust | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $5,010 |
54 | Robert E Hahs Rev Trust | Friedheim, MO 63747 | $4,928 |
55 | Michael Locke | Burfordville, MO 63739 | $4,905 |
56 | Steve Borgfield | Jackson, MO 63755 | $4,852 |
57 | Dennis Nagel | Jackson, MO 63755 | $4,775 |
58 | Ronald L Meyr Rev Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $4,685 |
59 | Bsr Farms LLC | Millersville, MO 63766 | $4,651 |
60 | Jeff Fadler | Jackson, MO 63755 | $4,640 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”