Total Conservation Programs in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 219
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri totaled $539,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Randy J Elfrink | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $2,000 |
82 | Stanley W Balsman | Uniontown, MO 63783 | $1,977 |
83 | , | $1,966 | |
84 | Jay M Strack | San Antonio, TX 78261 | $1,957 |
85 | Joan D Castellano | Saint Louis, MO 63109 | $1,878 |
86 | Masters Farm Inc | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $1,856 |
87 | Edward V Graves & Judith C Graves Living Trust | Friedheim, MO 63747 | $1,841 |
88 | , | $1,689 | |
89 | Roger M Seiler | Saint Louis, MO 63123 | $1,679 |
90 | Elizabeth Leann Buechlein | Millersville, MO 63766 | $1,627 |
91 | H W Land Company LLC | Burfordville, MO 63739 | $1,608 |
92 | Andrew David Blattner | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $1,580 |
93 | Terry Meyer | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $1,571 |
94 | Taylor Oaks Farms LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $1,538 |
95 | Js Rental Properties LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $1,472 |
96 | T Wayne Lewis | Jackson, MO 63755 | $1,445 |
97 | Ellen Kay Sneed | Jackson, MO 63755 | $1,428 |
98 | Fern L Shultz - Shultz Property Trust | Advance, MO 63730 | $1,375 |
99 | Mary Norma Buerck | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $1,339 |
100 | Ronnie Seiler | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $1,300 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”