Emergency Conservation Program in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 156
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri totaled $1,352,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Larry D Hahs | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $6,584 |
62 | Stanley B Haertling | Jackson, MO 63755 | $6,493 |
63 | Ronald L Meyr Rev Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $6,261 |
64 | Susan R Jahn | Jackson, MO 63755 | $5,926 |
65 | John W Quade Sr | Jackson, MO 63755 | $5,893 |
66 | Kight Family Revocable Inter Vivos Trust | Whitewater, MO 63785 | $5,773 |
67 | Bill Kurre | Friedheim, MO 63747 | $5,461 |
68 | David Lynn Roth | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $5,211 |
69 | Triangle Farm & Supply Corp | Jackson, MO 63755 | $5,008 |
70 | The Miesner Farm LLC | Frohna, MO 63748 | $4,943 |
71 | Detjen Marital Revocable Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $4,800 |
72 | Mark J Reitzel | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $4,774 |
73 | Kenneth Buerck | Perryville, MO 63775 | $4,765 |
74 | Roy Gable | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $4,660 |
75 | Mark D Haertling & Catherine L Haertling Rev Trust | Altenburg, MO 63732 | $4,634 |
76 | Robin Jones | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $4,627 |
77 | Richard Baer | Old Appleton, MO 63770 | $4,577 |
78 | Stephen Daume | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $4,432 |
79 | Justin Suhr | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $4,329 |
80 | Bob L Johnson Revocable Trust | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $4,275 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”