Deficiency Payment in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 535
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri totaled $819,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Terry Lane Hopkins | Burfordville, MO 63739 | $3,530 |
62 | Mark Wessell | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $3,526 |
63 | Ahrens Qualified Spousal Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $3,490 |
64 | Debrock Family Trust | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $3,476 |
65 | Doug Seabaugh | Jackson, MO 63755 | $3,444 |
66 | Vernon L Eggimann | Jackson, MO 63755 | $3,397 |
67 | Bartels Joint Rev Trust | Whitewater, MO 63785 | $3,359 |
68 | Leon Aufdenberg Rev Trust | Burfordville, MO 63739 | $3,274 |
69 | Brennecke & Rampley | Jackson, MO 63755 | $3,240 |
70 | David Ray Retherford Jr | Advance, MO 63730 | $3,180 |
71 | Robert Aufdenberg Rev Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $3,129 |
72 | Paul William Nothdurft Rev Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $3,116 |
73 | Doyle M Oehl | Jackson, MO 63755 | $3,110 |
74 | Randal Kight | Whitewater, MO 63785 | $3,105 |
75 | Larry L Bock Rev Trust | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $3,096 |
76 | Milton Nitsch | Jackson, MO 63755 | $3,093 |
77 | Joe Schwartz | Scott City, MO 63780 | $3,028 |
78 | Gerhard M Birk | Jackson, MO 63755 | $3,012 |
79 | Harl Friedrich Estate | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $2,997 |
80 | Darrell Gene Hahs | Friedheim, MO 63747 | $2,976 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”