Total Conservation Programs in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 792
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri totaled $22,128,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Vernon - Ludwig Vol Ludwig | Jackson, MO 63755 | $164,696 |
| 22 | Lorene Seabaugh Living Trust | Millersville, MO 63766 | $162,676 |
| 23 | Robert Kinder Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $161,633 |
| 24 | Curtis - Lorenz Rev Wayne Lorenz | Jackson, MO 63755 | $161,104 |
| 25 | E E Volz | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $160,358 |
| 26 | Lonnie Theodore Grebe | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $159,140 |
| 27 | John W Lorberg Rev Trust | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $158,097 |
| 28 | David R Seabaugh | Perryville, MO 63775 | $158,072 |
| 29 | Paul R Pohlman | Perryville, MO 63775 | $148,324 |
| 30 | Francis J Bredall | Saint Louis, MO 63114 | $147,050 |
| 31 | Gary Loyd Sides | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $145,207 |
| 32 | Fred Vogt | Cape Girardeau, MO 63702 | $145,179 |
| 33 | Daryl Owens | Jackson, MO 63755 | $134,229 |
| 34 | Mark E Nussbaum | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $133,245 |
| 35 | Michael Jessup | Jackson, MO 63755 | $128,377 |
| 36 | Robert L Ford & Marty D Ford Joint Revocable Trust | Whitewater, MO 63785 | $123,424 |
| 37 | Michael Tomlin | Jackson, MO 63755 | $123,258 |
| 38 | W David Goodson And Jean Ann Goodson Revocable Liv | Jackson, MO 63755 | $118,208 |
| 39 | M G Mccrate Revocable Family Livi | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $112,002 |
| 40 | Paul Ray Dow | Jackson, MO 63755 | $111,080 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf