Conservation Reserve Program in Cass County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 167
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cass County, Missouri totaled $619,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dorothy J Barrow | Grain Valley, MO 64029 | $2,008 |
82 | Lyle Krehbiel Trust | Overland Park, KS 66223 | $1,951 |
83 | Ronald J Highley | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $1,940 |
84 | La Frances C Winter | Garden City, MO 64747 | $1,876 |
85 | Lavada Rose Finke | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $1,858 |
86 | Richard Schrock | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $1,825 |
87 | Joyce E Schifferdecker | Lees Summit, MO 64082 | $1,783 |
88 | John D Bacher Trust | Silver Spring, MD 20906 | $1,781 |
89 | Sears Family LLC | El Reno, OK 73036 | $1,719 |
90 | Virginia G Wallis | Kansas City, MO 64153 | $1,684 |
91 | Joyce Burton | Pleasant Hill, MO 64080 | $1,630 |
92 | Dave Klaus | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $1,608 |
93 | David And Nicole Thurman Farms LLC | Archie, MO 64725 | $1,552 |
94 | Nancy Collings | Lees Summit, MO 64081 | $1,544 |
95 | Kelly Collings | Pleasant Hill, MO 64080 | $1,544 |
96 | Benjamin N Rains | Pleasant Hill, MO 64080 | $1,540 |
97 | Genevieve Vondemfange | Raymore, MO 64083 | $1,447 |
98 | Victor Kyle Mueller | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $1,428 |
99 | Gene Noell | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $1,378 |
100 | Lucas Joint Revocable Living Trust Dated 2/5/08 - | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $1,356 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”