Total Conservation Programs in Cedar County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 278
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cedar County, Missouri totaled $5,647,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fred Wosoba | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $34,283 |
42 | Kenneth Wayne Wood | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $31,644 |
43 | Don Nikodim | Columbia, MO 65202 | $30,977 |
44 | J D Norman | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $30,212 |
45 | John R Koger | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $30,011 |
46 | Linda Mcginnis | Rockville, MO 64780 | $27,054 |
47 | William Villines | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $26,512 |
48 | Archie Brackenridge | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $24,542 |
49 | Dallas Cramer | Stockton, MO 65785 | $24,509 |
50 | Zachary Whitaker | Stockton, MO 65785 | $24,408 |
51 | Darren Dody | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $22,792 |
52 | Deral F Mays And Nelva L Mays Rev | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $22,273 |
53 | David Janes | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $22,179 |
54 | Larry Stanley | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $21,976 |
55 | Linda Wagner | Stockton, MO 65785 | $21,852 |
56 | Oscar Clark | Stockton, MO 65785 | $21,656 |
57 | Wagoner Cemetery | Stockton, MO 65785 | $21,450 |
58 | Judy Rice | Lamar, MO 64759 | $20,839 |
59 | Waylon Ferguson | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $20,783 |
60 | Richard Culbertson | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $20,483 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”